A Primer on Regency Era Men’s Fashion
Last week’s post covered Regency Era Women’s Fashions. So this week we’ll focus on Regency Era Men’s Fashion. These lists aren’t exhaustive and represent fashions men of the upper classes rather than working class wore. However, they should help you recognize what an author means and why they’re so focused on their characters being fashion conscious.
Last week, we covered the terms “Undress”, “Half Dress” and “Full Dress”. For men, “Undress” included having his jacket and cravat removed, something that was not done in polite or mixed company if the gentleman could avoid it. Dressing gowns and robes also fit this bill for gentlemen lounging at home. “Half Dress” for men meant less elaborate knots in their neck cloths, and more casual styles of clothing. “Full Dress” and “Evening Dress” are the equivalent of today’s black tie affairs. Therefore, Almack’s was a special case, where gentlemen of the ton were expected to wear breeches instead of trousers.
Regency Era Men’s Fashions
If you haven’t seen the movie, Beau Brummell – This Charming Man (affiliate link)with James Purefoy and Hugh Bonneville, let me whet your appetite with this clip of the opening. It tells the story of Beau Brummel and his influence on all matters sartorial.
Ahh, those visuals are something else, aren’t they?
I’ll wait if you want to replay it in full screen mode.
Ok, back now? Good. Most importantly, did you notice the anachronism? There’s a big, glaring one. It’s much more dramatic looking when James Puerfoy’s shirt opens all the way down the front instead of only partway down from the neck. So, good cinematic choice, bad historical detail.
The clip reminds me that author Kalen Hughes has a great post over at Word Wenches where she goes through the steps of dressing your Regency hero from the skin out. If you visit that post, you’ll get better idea of how long it took to dress and the order everything goes on or off in. In the same vein, Jessamyn’s Regency Costume Companion has a fabulous page that describes and details a number of men’s Regency Era fashions.
Underclothes
- Small Clothes/Smalls/Drawers
- short drawers (more like modern boxers) or long drawers (basically what we think of as long johns)
- Stockings and Garters
- Calf-high, usually cotton or silk.
Gentlemen, like ladies, possessed a variety of outfits considered appropriate to a specific activity. So for example, one required specific jackets more suited to riding, but overall the emphasis and time spent on dressing for the next activity was not as time-consuming for men as it was for women. Isn’t that always the case?
Basic Upper Body Garments
- Shirts
- Typically made from white muslin, shirts pulled on and off over the head and did not button all the way up the front like modern dress shirts and the one in the video above. Collars would have been high enough to reach the chin when starched and standing up. Similary, the neck and sleeves might have ruffles or not.
- Waist Coat
- What we’d think of today as a vest, these had a high collar and could be double breasted but were usually single breasted. Properly pronounced as “wes-kit”.
- Tailcoat/jacket/coat
- Likewise, men’s tailcoats could be double or single breasted, with a distinctive “M” shape to the tails.
Basic Lower Body Garments
- Pants
- Men enjoyed a variety of pants of different lengths and snugness. Rather than a modern zipper, Regency breeches opened with a flap called a “fall” that opened in the front and fastened with an elaborate series of buttons. The width of the front panel determined if one was wearing “broad fall” or “narrow fall” breeches. The Historical Hussies have a great post on Regency Men’s Pants that includes a great illustration of this construction.
- Breeches
- Knee length pants worn with stockings during this period. Considered old-fashioned, breeches were de rigueur at Almack’s.
- Trousers with braces (suspenders)
- Originally worn by the working class, trousers became an option for the upper classes around 1807. Regency men did not wear belts due to the construction of their pants and the cut of their coats. Instead, suspenders or braces kept their pants in place.
- Pantaloons
- Cut on the bias to achieve a much closer fit and typically worn with highly polished tall boots, pantaloons extended to mid calf or below.
- Inexpressibles
- Scandalously tight leggings that left little to the imagination.
- Buckskins
- Made from deerskin and considered the equivalent of denim jeans in their day, comfortable and practical.
Outerwear
- Great Coat
- Think of a great coat as the flamboyant and dashing trenchcoat of its day, not all were as fancy as to have capes attached, but many were simple coats to keep one warm or dry.
- Shoes
- Worn for informal occasions and evening events, usually made of leather.
- Boots
- Typically Hessians were acceptable during the day but not at night. Top boots were another popular choice.
Accessories
- Cravat/stock
- Elevated by George “Beau” Brummel, this long rectangular piece of cloth became quite the showpiece. Depending on the man’s rank and skill of his valet, the cravat was starched and folded and then tied in one of numerous ways, ranging from simple to complicated knots. Get more information at Regency Reproductions and also a free pattern to make a cravat.
- Gloves, Canes, Pocket Watches, Watch Fobs, Quizzing Glasses
- All indicators of wealth and status. However, they were also functional and practical as well as examples of fine craftsmanship.
- Wallets or Purses
- Made of leather or fabric to hold notes and coins
- Hats
- Several styles to choose from: topper (what we call a top hat), beaver hat
In the Bedchamber
- Nightclothes/Nightshirt
- Basically a loose, ankle-length nightgown with a floppy open collar — all those heroes must be freezing in their birthday suits!
- Nightcap
- A knitted silk hat with a tassel on the end
- Banyan/Robe/Dressing Gown
- A dressing gown was a loose, wraparound, floor-length bathrobe sort of garment. Banyans reached knee-length and fitted more closely to the body. Most preferred rich-colored, luxurious fabrics, such as satin, velvet, or silk damask.
Fascinating! I must watch that movie. 🙂
I really enjoyed it. It was definitely eye-candy, but also a good overview of his story and the politics of the time. I can’t remember who it was, but one of the Romance Divas recommended it a couple years ago. Hope you like it too!
Excellent post. I bookmarked it for future reference. Loved Beau Brummel This Charming Man. Such a fun movie and who can resist dishy James Purefoy?
Thanks, Georgie! I need to see what else Purefoy’s done. I also love Hugh Bonneville. Can’t wait until Downton Abbey starts up again here.
Woukd they really have called him “Mr Beau Brummel”? Surely Mr Brummel or Mr George Brummel would have been more correct.
And what about top boots. Hessians with pantaloons, top boots with breeches is what I always understood. If you look at the shape of the top of Hessian boots the cutaway style would have been graceless with the line of the bottom of the breeches.
Thanks for stopping in and watching the clip, Doreen!
It took me a minute to figure out where I’d mistyped Brummel’s name. Phew! I forgot that they say it over and over and over in the opening scene. I think perhaps they were trying to show how close their friendship was and also how very informal this meeting between Brummel and the Prince Regent was, as he ends up being shown in to Prinny’s dressing room where the clip cuts off. And I suspect a bit of Hollywood flare, drama and poetic license was also in place.
As far as boots, I’ll admit I didn’t delve as deeply as I could have. You’re correct. Would you mind if I updated the entry for boots above to reflect your comment’s information?
This morning, I did find a thorough “History of Boots” post that focuses on Regency boot styles and their influences that has wonderful sources listed, but is also an ugly wall-o-text: http://historyofboots.blogspot.com/2009/06/regency-period-boots.html
Great post. I don’t write regency, but I enjoy reading it. BTW, what are quizzing glasses?
Thanks, Maggie! I really enjoy reading them too.
Candice Hern has some great info over here. http://www.candicehern.com/collections/04/eyeglass.htm
As she says, it’s basically a single magnifying lens with a handle. Or a monocle.
I’ve most often seen it used to illustrate a haughty manner by a high ranking peer looking down on someone else. But they were popular items of jewelry for both men and women by the end of the late 18th century when the term “quizzing glass” came into use.
Another mistake in the footage of Beau Brummel getting dressed was his fob. It would have been attatched to his watch and slipped into his pocket for that purpose on his breeches waistband. Not clipped onto the waistband as shown. What was the point of that? Nice to watch though!!!
I believe gloves for gentlemen in the 18th century were sometimes soft yellow leather. What do you know about this, please? Thank you from Kathmandu. M. Davis
Sorry, I don’t know details like that for 18th Century gloves. =( You might want to check out The Worshipful Company of Glovers at http://www.glovecollectioncatalogue.org/index.html
Thank you for your quick reply w/ the link. I typed 18th for 19th century! So if anyone knows about Regency gloves for men… Martine Davis, KTM
Very interesting post. Thanks for it. I have bookmarked it
You’re welcome. Glad you found it interesting!
Would men have worn a floor length velvet cape with a black satin collar or would a women wear this?
Hi Norma, thanks for stopping by and posing an interesting question!
I spent a chunk of yesterday looking into this and from what I could find, men’s fashions in the Regency were much more form fitting than a floor-length cape like that would be. Now, great coats tend to break that, but they still have more “shape” to them and often had several capelets for flair. So I’d guess that a floor length velvet cape would be late 18th Century or later than the Regency in the 19th Century for men. So for Regency, I’d expect a cape like that to be worn by a woman or if worn by a man, perhaps as part of a masquerade costume. Also, I’d expect a woman’s cape to be more colorful than a stark black.
If anyone else has any insights or information, I’d love to hear it!